US judge rejects Green Party’s Pennsylvania recount case

(AP)  – A federal judge on Monday issued a stinging rejection of a Green Party-backed request to recount paper ballots in Pennsylvania’s presidential election, won by Republican Donald Trump, and scan some counties’ election systems for signs of hacking.

In this Dec. 5, 2016, AP photo, participants listen to a speaker at a rally at the Pennsylvania Capitol in support of a Green Party-backed quest for a recount of Pennsylvania's Nov. 8 presidential election. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Dec. 5, 2016 | AP Photo/Marc Levy, St. George News
In this Dec. 5, 2016, AP photo, participants listen to a speaker at a rally at the Pennsylvania Capitol in support of a Green Party-backed quest for a recount of Pennsylvania’s Nov. 8 presidential election. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Dec. 5, 2016 | AP Photo/Marc Levy, St. George News

In his 31-page decision, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond said there were at least six grounds that required him to reject the Green Party’s lawsuit, which had been opposed by Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general’s office.

Suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election “borders on the irrational” while granting the Green Party’s recount bid could “ensure that that no Pennsylvania vote counts” given Tuesday’s federal deadline to certify the vote for the Electoral College, Diamond wrote.

“Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any ‘hack’ occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised,” Diamond wrote. He also said the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an “unexplained, highly prejudicial” wait before filing last week’s lawsuit.

In this Dec. 8, 2016, AP photo, Michigan residents walk towards the Michigan State Supreme Court for a rally to speak out against the courts decision to shut down Michigan's recount on Thursday, in Lansing. Michigan's recount of presidential votes is over after a judge lifted an order that forced a statewide review of millions of ballots. The recount lasted three days in more than 20 of the state's 83 counties. Lansing, Michigan, Dec. 8, 2016 | Photo by Samantha Madar /Jackson Citizen Patriot via AP; St. George News
In this Dec. 8, 2016, AP photo, Michigan residents walk towards the Michigan State Supreme Court for a rally to speak out against the courts decision to shut down Michigan’s recount on Thursday, in Lansing. Michigan’s recount of presidential votes is over after a judge lifted an order that forced a statewide review of millions of ballots. The recount lasted three days in more than 20 of the state’s 83 counties. Lansing, Michigan, Dec. 8, 2016 | Photo by Samantha Madar /Jackson Citizen Patriot via AP; St. George News

The decision was the Green Party’s latest roadblock in Pennsylvania after hitting numerous walls in county and state courts. Green Party-backed lawyers argue that it was possible that computer hackers changed the election outcome and that Pennsylvania’s heavy use of paperless machines makes it a prime target. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein also contended that Pennsylvania has erected unconstitutional barriers to voters seeking a recount.

It is part of a broader effort by Stein to recount votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Trump won all three states narrowly over Democrat Hillary Clinton, while Stein captured about 1 percent of the vote, or less, in all three states.

In Pennsylvania, Trump beat Clinton in Pennsylvania by about 44,000 votes out of 6 million cast.

A federal judge halted Michigan’s recount last week after three days. The Wisconsin recount was expected to conclude Monday. With about 95 percent of the votes recounted as of Sunday, Clinton had gained 25 votes on Trump, but still trailed by about 22,000.

Written by MARC LEVY, Associated Press. Associated Press reporter Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, contributed to this report.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

4 Comments

  • Real Life December 12, 2016 at 11:47 am

    Jill Stein had her moment, and that moment is gone. She will however do all that she can to stay in the spotlight, even though no one cares about her.

  • Ron December 12, 2016 at 1:21 pm

    Jill Stein is a Hillary Clinton surrogate…hack.
    So sad, too bad.
    It’s over.
    Get over it!

  • Henry December 12, 2016 at 3:34 pm

    The AP didn’t include that Stein has raised over $7.1 million to contest the election results, and her website says that she will retain any money not used in the recount efforts. Bernie Madoff would be proud of such an ingenious scam.

  • 42214 December 12, 2016 at 8:09 pm

    The libtards fell for Stein’s scam hook, line and sinker.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.