Trump’s review and policy order; national monuments at a glance

Top photo: President Donald Trump holds a signed Antiquities Executive Order during a ceremony at the Interior Department in Washington, D.C., Wednesday. The president is asking for a review of the designation of tens of millions of acres of land as “national monuments.” District of Columbia, April, 26, 2017. Background is an AP file photo showing Bears Ears buttes near Blanding, Utah, June 22, 2016. | AP Photos by Carolyn Kaster (Trump with executive order), Rick Bowmer, File (Bears Ears); St. George News

ST. GEORGE — President Donald Trump’s review order for 24 national monuments established by three former presidents over the past two decades puts in limbo federal restrictions over large swaths of land across the country.

The review is predicated in part on the proposition these monuments may exceed the purposes of the Antiquities Act, both in size and scope of control.

Proponents of the monuments see them as protecting lands home to ancient cliff dwellings, towering Sequoias, deep, canyons and oceans habitats where seals, whales and sea turtles roam. Opponents see them as unduly restrictive, denying or impairing public access, use and enjoyment of public lands, state and local management from those central to the lands, with negative impacts on individual livelihoods and economies of state and adjacent communities.

President Donald Trump signs an Antiquities Executive Order during a ceremony at the Interior Department in Washington, Wednesday. President Donald Trump is asking for a review of the designation of tens of millions of acres of land as “national monuments.” Interior Department, District of Columbia, April 26, 2017 | AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, St. George News

Previous administrations used the Antiquities Act to “unilaterally put millions of acres of land and water under strict federal control,” Trump said ahead of signing his executive order Wednesday, calling the practice a “a massive federal land grab.”

Trump and other critics say presidents have lost sight of the original purpose of the law created by President Theodore Roosevelt that was designed to protect particular historical or archaeological sites rather than wide expanses.

As a matter of policy, Trump’s order states, monument designations should be made in accordance with the requirements and original objectives of the Antiquities Act and appropriately balance the protection of landmarks, structures and objects against the appropriate use of federal lands and the effects on surrounding lands and communities.

The order calls for the interior secretary’s review of monuments that exceed 100,000 acres and meet other criteria. The review is to determine if the designations conform to policy stated in the order.

The Antiquities Act specified monument designations shall not exceed “the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to be protected,” Trump’s order recites and sets forth policy, in part as follows:

Such designations are a means of stewarding America’s natural resources, protecting America’s natural beauty, and preserving America’s historic places.  Monument designations that result from a lack of public outreach and proper coordination with State, tribal, and local officials and other relevant stakeholders may also create barriers to achieving energy independence, restrict public access to and use of Federal lands, burden State, tribal, and local governments, and otherwise curtail economic growth.  Designations should be made in accordance with the requirements and original objectives of the Act and appropriately balance the protection of landmarks, structures, and objects against the appropriate use of Federal lands and the effects on surrounding lands and communities.

An interim report with recommendations on Bears Ears in particular and other monuments the secretary deems appropriate is to be delivered within 45 days and a final report within 120 days of the executive order.

Read more: Trump orders review of millions of acres in national monuments

Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch issued the following statement following the signing ceremony:

Today’s executive action is the culmination of months of hard work and close coordination with the White House. When I first spoke with President Trump in the Oval Office during his first week on the job, I asked for his help in addressing the Bears Ears debacle. From day one, our President has been committed to helping us fix this disaster and ensuring that our smallest counties get a fair shake. For years, I have fought to give voice to the needs of our rural communities in the debate over public lands. Time and again, past Presidents have abused their authority under the Antiquities Act to satisfy the demands of an extreme environmental agenda. But no more. Following today’s action, I look forward to working with the Trump administration to establish a new precedent of collaboration and trust between states and the federal government as we work toward a shared goal of preserving our cultural antiquities.

A closer look by The Associated Press, except as indicated, at five of the monuments on the list set to be re-examined:

In this Dec. 29, 2016, AP file photo, a young protester demonstrates with others against the new Bears Ear National Monument in Montecello, Utah, when then-President Barack Obama designated national monuments in Utah and Nevada in the final days of his presidency despite considerable opposition from local officials. | Rick Egan/The Salt Lake Tribune via AP)

Bears Ears National Monument, Utah

The creation of the 1.3 million-acre monument in December was seen as a victory by some Native American tribes and conservationists and a blow to Utah Republican leaders who campaigned hard to prevent a designation they contend is a layer of unnecessary federal control that hurts local economies by closing the area to new energy development.

Tucked between existing national parks and the Navajo Nation, the monument is on land considered sacred to a coalition of tribes and is home to an estimated 100,000 archaeological sites, including ancient cliff dwellings. Tribal members visit the area to perform ceremonies, collect herbs and wood for medicinal and spiritual purposes and do healing rituals.

Other Native Americans opposed the monument, among them those residing in the Bears Ears region. St. George News reported in December 2016 that Rebecca Benally, a Navajo and a San Juan County commissioner, said President Obama would not be designating the monument for the local people, but for groups that are using the Navajo to further their own agenda.

Snow-covered remnants of an Anasazi tower ruin on the rim of Mule Canyon in the Cedar Mesa area of Bears Ears National Monument, Utah, undated | Photo by lightphoto / iStock / Getty Images Plus, St. George News

San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman told St. George News Tuesday increased tourism traffic since the monument designation has had more negative than positive impact on the sites the monument seeks to protect.

“The monument designation will only bring more people to that area for sightseeing and recreational purposes, which is in part why the local Native American tribe has been, and is still, so adamant about not wanting that area designated a monument,” Lyman said.

The monument features a mix of cliffs, plateaus, towering rock formations, rivers and canyons.

Led by U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch, Utah’s congressional delegation and top state leaders immediately vowed to work to get the monument repealed. Trump applauded Hatch for his dogged insistence while signing the executive order.

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is due to make a recommendation on Bears Ears within 45 days ahead of a final report about all the monuments within 120 days.

This undated file photo released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration made during the Northeast U.S. Canyons Expedition 2013, shows corals on Mytilus Seamount off the coast of New England in the North Atlantic Ocean. | NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration and Research via AP, File, St. George News

Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument, Maine

Designated by President Barack Obama in September 2016, the Atlantic Ocean’s first marine national monument consists of nearly 5,000 square miles of underwater canyons and mountains off the New England coast. The designation was widely praised by environmentalists as a way to protect important species and habitat for whales and sea turtles while reducing the toll of climate change.

The designation closed the area to commercial fishermen, who go there primarily for lobster, red crab, squid, whiting, butterfish, swordfish and tuna. A coalition of commercial fishing groups filed a lawsuit in March to overturn the designation. They argued the creation of the monument would bring economic distress to fishermen and their families.

In this July 24, 2002, AP file photo, a reporter walks through the trunk of a 2,000-year-old giant Sequoia inside the Giant Sequoia National Monument, California. | AP Photo/Kevork Djansezian, File, St. George News

Giant Sequoia National Monument, California

In a decision praised by environmentalists but scorned by loggers, President Bill Clinton created this monument in 2000 covering about 328,000 acres of land in central California where the giant sequoia grows naturally. It expanded the number of groves protected, adding to Sequoias already safeguarded in Kings Canyon and Yosemite National Park.

In announcing his decision, Clinton marveled at the resilience of a partially charred tree that had been struck by lightning decades ago. “Look how deep the burn goes,” he said. “These giant sequoias clearly are the work of the ages. They grow taller than the Statue of Liberty, broader than a bus.”

A coalition of timber interest groups, recreation groups and a California county sued to reverse the designation or reduce the size. They argued that the trees were already protected and that the county’s school districts depended on money that came from fees collected for logging. A federal judge dismissed that lawsuit.

In 2006, a federal judge rejected a plan by the Bush administration plan to allow commercial logging inside the monument.

n this Sept. 1, 2016, file photo, a portion of Midway Atoll in the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument is seen from Air Force One, with President Barack Obama aboard, as it comes in for a landing at Henderson Field. | AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, file, St. George News

Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument, Hawaii

This remote monument northwest of Hawaii’s main islands was created by President George W. Bush in 2006 and was quadrupled in size last year by President Barack Obama. The nearly 583,000-square mile safe zone for tuna, the endangered Hawaiian monk seal and thousands of other species is the world’s largest marine protected area, more than twice the size of Texas.

Obama pointed to the zone’s diverse ecology and cultural significance to Native Hawaiian and early Polynesian culture as reasons for expanding the monument when he visited the turquoise waters last fall.

“I look forward to knowing that 20 years from now, 40 years from now, 100 years from now, this is a place where people can still come to and see what a place like this looks like when it’s not overcrowded and destroyed by human populations,” Obama said.

The decision to expand the monument was the subject of fierce debate within Hawaii, with both sides invoking Native Hawaiian culture to argue why it should or shouldn’t be expanded.

This file photo shows The Toadstools near Big Water, Utah located within the boundaries of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah, date not specified | Photo courtesy of Carolyn Barton, St. George News

The monument designation bans commercial fishing and any new mining. Fishing will be allowed through a permit, as will be scientific research and the removal.

Opponents argued the region is heavily dependent on fishing and can’t afford the hit, adding that a federal ban would infringe on the traditions that ancient Hawaiians used to protect natural resources.

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah

The oldest monument on the list, President Bill Clinton created the monument in Southern Utah in 1996 by signing a declaration at the south rim of the Grand Canyon in Arizona. It was lauded by environmentalists for preserving scenic cliffs, canyons, waterfalls and arches with actor and Utah resident Robert Redford appearing at the ceremony with Clinton.

But in heavily Republican Utah, the move was viewed as a sneaky, stab-in-the back example of federal overreach that still irks the political establishment 20 years later. Many Utah Republicans and some local residents contend it closed off too many areas to development – including one of the country’s largest known coal reserves – that could have helped pay for local schools.

Closed sawmill that used to provide jobs, Escalante, Utah, June 15, 2015 | Photo by Carin Miller, St. George News

In 2015, the county where it’s located declared a state of emergency for falling school enrollment, and county commissioners laid some of the blame on Grand Staircase.

Read more: Garfield, Escalante on verge of devastation; state of emergency imminent

This year, Utah Republican Gov. Gary Herbert signed a resolution from state lawmakers asking Utah’s congressional delegation to support shrinking the monument that is nearly 1.9 million acres, about the size of Delaware.

BRADY McCOMBS, Associated Press, contributed to this report.

ST. GEORGE NEWS reporter Tracie Sullivan contributed to this report.


Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright St. George News, LLC, 2017, all rights reserved.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press as to AP contributed content. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.