Washington County has decreased water use by over 1 billion gallons, officials say

Stock image, St. George News

ST. GEORGE – Despite its continuing growth, Washington County decreased water use by over a billion gallons over five years, according to the most recently available data.

Earlier this month, Utah Division of Water Resources released state water-use data for 2015 that showed Washington County’s water use is lower than nearly 60 percent of the other counties in the state, the Washington County Water Conservancy District stated in a press release.

According to the numbers, county residents used 143 gallons per person daily – also known as gallons per capita per day or GPCD. Factoring in all potable water use, including second home, commercial, institutional and industrial use, the total was 230 GPCD.

Unlike most other states, Utah also reports secondary water, which comprises untreated and reclaimed water. Of the 72 GPCD secondary water-use reported by Washington County, over two-thirds is used to irrigate parks, cemeteries and golf courses.

Story continues below graphic

Graphic courtesy of the Washington County Water Conservancy District, St. George News | Click to enlarge

Factors behind less water use?

“I think it’s really a function of a lot of things,” Ron Thompson, Washington County Water Conservancy District general manager, told St. George News.

Water the garden, St. George, Utah, June 16, 2017 | Photo by Mori Kessler, St. George News

Among those factors is a “really aggressive conservation plan” and new construction that is implementing water-wise landscaping.

Other factors Thompson pointed to include county municipalities like St. George and others that have time-of-day watering ordinances and conservation plans of their own. Many municipalities are also redoing their landscaping ordinances to be more water-wise, Thompson said.

Read more: St. George enacts daytime watering ban

Public education has also likely playing a part.

“We put a lot of effort into public education, making more people sensitive to how they are using their water,” Thompson said.

Among those education efforts is the annual “Water Week” event the water district holds each May. During the week the public is invited to tour water treatment facilities to see where their drinking water comes from and ultimately where it goes.

Read more: County residents discover how water gets from the Virgin River to their faucets

An accompanying water fair is held for elementary school students, an event that has taught an estimated 40,000 children about water and water conservation over the years, Thompson said.

The water district and municipalities have also invested over $60 million “more efficient” water infrastructure, he said.

Continuing growth and reduced use

A home under construction, date and location not specified | Photo courtesy of Self-Help Homes, St. George News

County residents began a trend of using less water in the mid-1990s, Thompson said, and overall water use has decreased between 30 and 35 percent since 2000.

“We think it’s going to continue,” he said. “I think we’ll be down 20 percent in a few more decades.”

Aiding in this trend will be a growing generation that is more water sensitive, Thompson said, as well as new, more water-efficient technologies.

Washington County grew by 13 percent between 2010 and 2015, with water use going down by 9 percent during the same period.

Conservation and the Lake Powell Pipeline

While water use decreased by over 1 billion gallons over five years, county water officials are adamant that conservation efforts will not be enough to provide the county with the water it needs to support a projected population of over 400,000 by 2060.

View of Lake Powell from the top of the dam, Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona, Jan. 2, 2018 | File photo by Reuben Wadsworth, St. George News

Currently the only source of water for Washington County water from the Virgin River and Virgin River basin, and that is anticipated to supply over half of the county’s future needs. Water from the proposed Lake Powell Pipeline would make up the other half.

Water conservation by this time is estimated to make up 18 percent of the county’s water use by 2060, said Karry Rathje, a spokeswoman for the water district.

“You can only stretch this water supply so far,” she said.

However, the proposed Lake Powell Pipeline comes with its own controversies. To learn more about the Lake Powell Pipeline, read: Negotiations begin for ‘water exchange’ key to the Lake Powell Pipeline

2015 data vs. 2010 data

Since the release of the Utah Division of Water Resources’ 2010 water use numbers, the division has undergone legislative and third-party audits to identify how water-use accounting can be improved, according to the Washington County Water Conservancy District. Water use numbers from 2015 are the first to reflect the audit recommendations.

Because the recommendations revised how the division calculated total water use in 2015, the numbers from previous reports will not be used by the division to calculate conservation accomplishments throughout the state.

Most changes were specific to the accounting of secondary water given the accuracy of metered culinary water use.

St. George News reporter Spencer Ricks contributed to this article.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @MoriKessler

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2018, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • An actual Independent June 28, 2018 at 8:12 am

    My first thought was “good news”.My immediate follow up thought was “is this real or just a function of how they did the numbers”? The last little section flat out states that the numbers are not done the way they used to be done.
    Anyway, drought appears to be the new norm so I hope we really do wise up regarding growth and water use.

    • beacon June 28, 2018 at 10:33 am

      Yes, it “appears” good until you run the numbers and realize it’s only about 4-5 gallons per person per day over the 5-year period. I’m sure that’s why the district used 1 billion gallons rather than providing that little bit of info. At least we’re moving in the right direction, but it’s certainly not enough to warrant their wanting us to commit several billion dollars to a water project that’s not needed now or anytime in the near future. We have a lot more conservation to achieve.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.