Sen. Lee, others, respond to ‘disturbing’ rumors of new national monument in Utah

ST. GEORGE – With rumors floating around that President Barack Obama may designate the Bears Ears National Monument in San Juan County as early as next week, Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee took to Facebook Tuesday night with a video to share his response with constituents as well as to ask the president to reconsider.

Map of proposed Bears Ears National monument in southeastern Utah | Image courtesy of Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition
Map of proposed Bears Ears National monument in southeastern Utah | Image courtesy of Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition

The new national monument would potentially cover 1.9 million acres and encompass 40 percent of San Juan County.

Lee touches on concerns that the president would be unilaterally designating the new monument via the Antiquities Act, with little regard as to whether or not it is a move supported by residents.

According to Lee and others, it most certainly is not.

“We don’t have anything close to that, not among elected officials down there, not among the people generally down there,” Lee said in the video.

The senator goes on to state that he will work with the incoming Trump administration to make sure the designation never happens, and if if does, to see to its undoing.

A portion of Lee’s statement from Tuesday’s video are transcribed below:

We have to remember that when Sally Jewel, the Secretary of the Interior, went through the Senate confirmation process after she was nominated … I asked her about how she would use this authority, how she would advise President Obama in using the Antiquities Act and she made a pretty solemn promise at the time.

(Jewel) said: “I would not advise the President of the United States to use the Antiquities Act in the absence of widespread local buy in.”

In other words the local affected communities, those most directly impacted by presidential designation of a monument under the Antiquities Act, would need to enjoy widespread local support. We don’t have that in San Juan County. We don’t have anything close to that, not among elected officials down there, not among the people generally down there.

I want to make clear, if heaven forbid this does happen, I will work tirelessly with the incoming Trump administration to make sure that this national monument never gets off the ground; to make sure it is undone, that is defunded, unrwritten, rewritten, repealed, whatever it is that we have to do to undo it.

Opponents of the potential monument designation call it a federal “land grab” that would greatly restrict access and use of area.

In a county where only 8 percent is private land, San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman said, restrictions on general access due to a monument designation could bring the biggest negative impact to county residents.

He also echoed Lee’s statement that local support for the designation is non-existent.

“There’s virtually no local support for this,” Lyman said, adding that the San Juan County Commission, state representatives who cover the county, and Utah’s congressional delegation are opposed to it as well. “It was be a real abuse of the Antiquities Act for (the president) to designate this.”

If Obama is looking to cement a part of his legacy with another national monument, Lyman said, it won’t be a flattering one.

“If the president wants to leave a legacy, this would leave a legacy of arrogance and collusion with special interest groups, not to mention a disregard for representative government,” Lyman said.

Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who has San Juan County in his congressional district, also said he hopes the president does designate the monument.

“Very concerned about the designation of a monument in southern Utah,” Chaffetz said over Facebook Wednesday. “It would be arrogant and devastating for the president to unilaterally misuse this authority. We have done everything we can do to try and find a balanced approach. I truly hope the president doesn’t singularly implement the agenda of the radical environmentalists.”

Supporters of the Bears Ears National Monument include the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition.

They argue the area needs to be protected in order to preserve a wealth of Native American archeological and cultural sites from destruction and looting. They also seek to restrict potential drilling by oil, gas and potash companies they say are eying the region.

Uranium mining and “irresponsible off-road vehicle use” are also counted as threats to the area by the monument supporters.

St. George News/Cedar City News reporter Tracie Sullivan contributed to this story.

Ed. note: The dateline of “ST. GEORGE” notes where this article was written, and not necessarily where the events detailed within  occurred.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @MoriKessler

Copyright St. George News, LLC, 2016, all rights reserved.


Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • old school December 14, 2016 at 9:04 pm

    If I was a San Juan resident losing all that looting income I’d be upset too!!!

  • Bender December 14, 2016 at 9:30 pm

    Since the Trump candidacy/election the bar for “disturbing” events has been significantly raised. No matter what your political stripe, Bears Ears NM designation would be small potatoes compared to what else has come and is coming down the pike.

  • r2d2 December 14, 2016 at 9:46 pm

    And they wonder why Utah doesn’t vote for democrats. I wonder if Obama will go to Arizona to do it.

  • Brian December 14, 2016 at 9:53 pm

    With the House, Senate, and Executive branch they need to amend the Antiquities Act to specifically close this loophole. It was never meant to be used the way it has been. It was meant to protect small, specific sites, not massive swaths of land.

  • hiker75 December 14, 2016 at 11:25 pm

    I am all for the national monument designation. How else will our lands be protected? Do our elected officials care? Nope!

    • .... December 15, 2016 at 8:52 am

      This is absolutely fantastic news and a wonderful idea and I would like to thank all those involved in making this possible. Praise the Lord !

  • Craig December 15, 2016 at 7:33 am

    Where in the Constitution is the authority for the federal government to own land outside of Washington, DC?

  • comments December 15, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    Aww, the poor little whiners won’t be able to turn the area into a big open pit mine, or litter it with oil and gas drilling rigs. We should set up a crying room for them, poor babies.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.